SOME HEALTHCARE COSTS MAY RISE WHEN "OBAMACARE" IMPLEMENTED: OFFICIAL

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama’s top healthcare adviser acknowledged on Tuesday that costs could rise in the individual health insurance market, particularly for men and younger people, because of the landmark 2010 healthcare restructuring due to take effect next year.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said definitive data on costs will not be available until later this year
when private health plans become authorized to sell federally subsidized coverage on new state-based online marketplaces, known as exchanges.

“Everything is speculation. I think there’s likely to be some shifting in the markets,” she told reporters at the White House.

The law, also known as “Obamacare,” eliminates discriminatory market practices that have imposed higher rates on women and people with medical conditions.

It also limits how much insurers can charge older people. But while the changes are expected to lower costs for women, older beneficiaries and the sick, men and younger, healthier people will likely see higher rates as insurers try to hedge against continued risks.

“Women are going to see some lower costs, some men are going to see some higher costs. It’s sort of a one to one shift … some of the older customers may see a slight decline, and some of the younger ones are going to see a slight increase.”

Insurance premiums could rise for some with individual plans, she said, as Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enhances the level of coverage and either eliminates or reduces the rate of price discrimination against people who are older, female
or have preexisting medical conditions.

“These folks will be moving into a really fully insured product for the first time, so there may be a higher cost associated with getting into that market,” Sebelius said.

But those who qualify for federal subsidies through state healthcare exchanges would still get a better deal, she said.

Her remarks coincide with growing uneasiness about possible cost increases among lawmakers and executives in the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry.

A new study released on Tuesday by the nonpartisan Society of Actuaries estimates that individual premiums will rise 32 percent on
average nationwide within three years, partly as a result of higher risk pools. Changes would vary by state, from an 80 percent hike in Wisconsin to a 14 percent reduction in New York.

Obama’s healthcare restructuring, the signature domestic policy achievement of his first term, is expected to provide coverage to more than 30 million people beginning on January 1, 2014, both through the state exchanges and a planned expansion of the government-run Medicaid program for the poor.

Subsidies in the form of premium tax credits, available on a sliding scale according to income, are expected to mitigate higher costs for many new beneficiaries.

But the insurance industry, which is set to gain millions of new customers under the law, is warning of soaring premium costs next year because of new regulations that include the need to offer a broader scale of health benefits than some insurers do now.

That has raised concerns about people with individual policies not subject to subsidies and the potential for cost spillovers into the
market for employer-sponsored plans, which according to U.S. Census data, cover about half of U.S. workers.

‘LITTLE IMPACT’

Sebelius dismissed the idea of significant change for employer plans, saying that market segment was “likely to see very little impact.”

Separately, a Democratic U.S. senator on Tuesday said the federal government has limited scope to help millions of people likely to remain without affordable health insurance under the new law.

Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, released a report submitted to the panel by the administration that outlines an “employee choice” policy that would allow some employers to offer a wider range of coverage choices to their workers at reduced rates for 2014.

But Wyden said the approach would not help many of the nearly 4 million worker dependents who may have to forego subsidized
private health coverage as a result of an IRS ruling.

“Even in the states that allow for employee choice, it will be limited to a small number of workers,” Wyden said.

The law would have most people with employer insurance remain under their current plans. Workers can opt for subsidized coverage if their employer plan is unaffordable, but only according to a narrow definition of what is affordable.

The IRS ruled in January that the cost of insuring a worker’s family will be considered unaffordable if the employee’s contribution to an individual coverage plan exceeded 9.5 percent of that person’s income. That rule ignores the fact that family coverage is far more expensive than individual coverage.

As a result, the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 3.9 million family dependents could be left unable either to afford employer-sponsored family coverage or to obtain federally subsidized insurance through an exchange.

In its report to the Senate committee, Sebelius’ department said some employers could claim a tax credit in 2014 to make coverage more affordable and offer workers a range of coverage plans through state-based exchanges.

3 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

*

*

  • Delia
    28 March 2013 at 7:40 pm - Reply

    Well, were in for a rough ride, since most voters wanted it this way , i guess people are happy now when their premium go sky high .Some people will get a free ride and some will have to pay huge amount and less income. So lets see how this goes without scrathing their head after they see their paycheck got slash big .

  • JT
    29 March 2013 at 4:01 am - Reply

    During the campaign on the Obama Health care , Obama promised that medical insurance cost will be reduce for at least $ 2,500 a year for each individual. Now it is the reverse, there will be an increase of insurance cost for 32%. During the passing on Obama care Democrats voted 100% vs O votes from Republican. It passed because that time Dems control the Congress and the Senate. I blame Obama for lying, blame the Democrats for not reading the bill, (Peloci said “sign the bill now, then read it later”.) I blame also the voters, Obama care should have been repealed.

  • Delia
    29 March 2013 at 6:24 am - Reply

    @JT, It pains me badly to why so many idiots believe in Obamas lies. I do not understand to why voters got so duped up and does’nt do research about this Man . From the begginning untill now they still adore this man which feeds nothing but lies.

    FOR FIFTY CONSECUTIVE MONTHS.Fewer people will have a job and more people will get food stamps…Fewer Americans had a job than the month before. Every month more folks get food stamps..
    The biggest fraud in the history of the nation has been perpetrated against the American people.Obama, a man who holds little allegiance to our country, and in fact has taken many actions in the last four years which have harmed the national interest, must be held to account in a court of law under the rule of law.

    Obamacare will no longer allow money from health savings or flexible spending accounts to purchase non-prescription, over-the counter drugs a $5 billion tax on people trying to treat their own medical problems. That is just a prescription to steer people to the doctor’s office instead of the pharmacy counter.

    The American People have re-elected a President who is hell bent in driving this great country into bankruptcy where are freedoms if any will be given by him, and he will not stop until he fulfills his communist wishes and paves a way to Socialism and the worst economic decline of all time all eventually leading to the United States of Islam.

    Obama has one glaring problem. no executive experience! He thinks flying around the country, giving more and more speeches is how you govern. He has no clue and it has never occurred to him he should sit down with the Congressional leadership, on a frequent basis, to hack out some deals.

    Mostly, he is just an ignorant person who happened to get elected because a lot of stupid people voted for him and had no clue as to why they voted for him. I expect the same thing for the next 4 years . God Help Us All

  • POPULAR POSTS