NAPOLITANO: IMMIGRATION BILL WOULD BOOST SECURITY

ERICA WERNER,Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sweeping immigration legislation would improve U.S. security by helping authorities to know who is in the U.S., Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Tuesday, as supporters of an immigration overhaul marshaled arguments against opponents trying to slow it down in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings.

Testifying at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Napolitano said a wide-ranging bill circulating in Congress devotes more money to securing the border, requires employers to verify their workers’ identity and implements new systems to track people as they leave the country — something that might have helped when one of the suspected Boston bombers traveled to Russia last year. Of great importance, Napolitano said, is the eventual path to citizenship for the 11 million immigrants here illegally.

Republicans have criticized such a path as a divisive proposal that rewards law-breakers. But Napolitano said it is a fundamental tool to help law enforcement authorities know who is here.

“One of the real significant improvements made by this bill is to bring people out of the shadows,” she said. “We know who they are. We know where they are. And by the way, from a police perspective, once these people know that every time they interact with law enforcement they won’t be subject to removal, it will help with the reporting of crimes, the willingness to be a witness and so forth.”

Napolitano’s support for legislation that’s a top second-term priority for President Barack Obama was no surprise. While in the past she has criticized the idea of making a path to citizenship conditional on accomplishing border security goals first — as the new bill does — Napolitano didn’t repeat that criticism Tuesday. Instead she said that the border security “triggers” in the bill are achievable, suggesting they wouldn’t loom as major impediments to citizenship.

Even if the measure passes the full Senate, it faces an uncertain future in the Republican-led House where opposition to the overhaul has been strong. But some Republicans are modifying their opposition in the face the overwhelming backing Hispanics gave Democrats in the November elections. Hispanics are a growing influential bloc and may play a bigger role in election outcomes.

Napolitano’s testimony came as last week’s Boston Marathon bombings have clouded the introduction of the landmark immigration legislation, with Republicans suggesting it should be slowed down or revisited until more is known about any loopholes in the immigration system that the Boston bombers may have exploited, or national security flaws that should be addressed in the bill.

So far there is no indication the two suspected bombers, brothers of Chechen origin, violated U.S. immigration laws. They came legally about a decade ago when their family sought asylum, and both became legal permanent residents while one eventually attained U.S. citizenship.

Napolitano defended the asylum system now in place, describing an extensive process with multiple screenings.

She said any asylum applicant is thoroughly interviewed and vetted, run through databases, fingerprinted and vetted again when they become eligible for a green card and ultimately citizenship.

Napolitano also said the process has improved in the past four years, and she said the new immigration bill would build on that.

But the top committee Republican, Sen. Chuck Grassley, raised concerns because the bill eliminates a requirement that people apply for asylum within a year of arriving in the country, and allows new applications from those whose cases have been unsuccessful because they didn’t comply with the one-year bar to reapply. Napolitano said that nothing in the bill would weaken asylum procedures.

Authors of the bill including Sen. Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, have said they’re open to changes in the legislation should any issues come to light in the wake of the Boston situation, but so far there have been no flaws exposed in the immigration system that aren’t already addressed in the bill. The FBI apparently missed a trip to Russia by one of the suspected Boston bombers last year because his name was misspelled on a travel document, but that would be fixed in the bill because passports would be swiped electronically, not entered manually as now happens, Schumer said.

Napolitano disclosed Tuesday that despite the misspelling, the Homeland Security Department had known of the Russia trip because of “redundancies” in the system, but she praised the new electronic entry-exist system proposed in the bill. “It really does a good job of getting human error, to the extent it exists, out of the process,” she said.

4 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

*

*

  • Noz
    23 April 2013 at 7:10 pm - Reply

    candy coating of the reform bill to make it look like sustainable and manageable, which can be likely true in writing. the biggest problem is the federal government with history of refusing to enforce the INS laws. the SCOTUS passage of AZ’s critical INS law to stop anybody with probable cause to check the person or persons immigration status, made obama used his executive order to border patrols to look the other way, not to arrest illegal aliens crossing the borders, in plain language to ICE was to stop enforcing the INS laws. obama’s actions was and is a traitor to americans/legal residents by ditching the rule of laws, the public accepted such actions of obama was and is deplorable, either through good brain washing of the public by the liberal main stream medias or obama slobberers, so as usual, obama got away with murder.

  • ATSOY
    23 April 2013 at 10:46 pm - Reply

    Noz,
    This country is doomed! You know and I know that the 2014 election would put Pelosi back to power…which means kiss our a_ _ goodbye….! Rubio and Mccain sounds like extremist left wing!

    • Delia
      24 April 2013 at 3:17 pm - Reply

      Napolitano is an incompetent politically driven idiolog with no interest in Home Land Security. She will lie, mislead, obstruct or whatever is necessary to advance Obama’s agenda. She is willing to sacrifice the careers and lives of those in her charge in order to protect Obama’s quest to destroy this Nation as we know it. She’s not very bright and a poor lier, is it any wonder morale is low? Her task is to advance the power and scope of Government at the expense of our Freedom and Liberty thru fear and intimidation. Eric (with)Holder is much the same as are the majority of Obama’s oppointees. If we survive till 2016 and do not remove this Liberal Statist cancer from our government we will NOT recover ever

  • delia
    24 April 2013 at 7:22 am - Reply

    Impressive feats of sophistry have become the norm in discussions of illegal immigration.
    If legal benefits are conferred on illegal immigrants before the border is secured, we may as well give up any pretense that we have an immigration policy, because benefits conferred are never going to be taken back, no matter how porous the border remains.

  • POPULAR POSTS