2 Major Court Victories For Gay Marriage In US

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court handed two major victories Wednesday to advocates of gay marriage, ruling that same-sex couples should get the same federal benefits as heterosexual couples and clearing the way for the resumption of same-sex marriages in California, the most populous U.S. state.

The rulings, both by 5-4 margins, do not mean that gay marriage will be permitted throughout the United
States; most states still ban it. But they build on the momentum of the gay rights movement, with its broad shift in public attitudes, a dozen states adopting gay marriage and a U.S. president, Barack Obama, who has advocated for gay rights.

In one case, the court invalidated provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that has prevented married gay couples from receiving a range of tax, health and retirement benefits that are generally available to married people.

The second case was a technical legal ruling that left in place a lower court’s ruling striking own
California’s ban on gay marriage. It found that the defenders of the ban did not have the right to appeal the decision. The ruling probably will allow state officials to order the resumption of same-sex
unions in about a month.

Obama praised the court’s ruling on the federal marriage act, which he said “was discrimination enshrined in law.” Obama decided in 2011 to stop defending the 1996 law, concluding that it was legally indefensible.

“It treated loving, committed gay couples and lesbians as a separate and lesser class of people,” Obama said in a statement. “The Supreme Court has righted that wrong and our country is better off for it.”

Obama telephoned his congratulations to the plaintiffs in the California case from Air Force One en route to Africa.

Outside the Supreme Court, supporters of same-sex marriage burst into cheers and some wept openly upon hearing the decision. Chants of “Thank you” and “USA” came as the plaintiffs in the cases descended the marbled steps.

In his majority opinion in the marriage case, Justice Anthony Kennedy said, “DOMA’s principal effect is
to identify a subset of state-sanctioned marriages and make them unequal,” he said.
Wednesday’s outcome is clear for people who were married and live in states that allow same-sex marriage. They now are eligible for federal benefits.

The picture is more complicated for same-sex couples who traveled to another state to get married, or who have moved from a gay marriage state since being wed.

Their eligibility depends on the benefits they are seeking. For instance, immigration law focuses on where people were married, not where they live. But eligibility for government pension benefits basically depends on where a couple is living when a spouse dies.

The rulings came 10 years to the day after the court’s Lawrence v. Texas decision that struck down state bans on gay sex. In his dissent at the time, Justice Antonin Scalia predicted the ruling would lead to same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage now has been adopted by 12 states and the Washington district. Another 18,000 couples were married in California during a brief period when same-sex unions were legal there.

8 Comments on this post.

Leave a Reply



  • kikayPang0
    26 June 2013 at 8:16 pm - Reply

    Their next demand …. entitlement of maternity leave .

  • deliasuional
    26 June 2013 at 8:25 pm - Reply

    That is already part of the federal benefits.

  • Delia
    27 June 2013 at 5:20 am - Reply

    This gives them license to wrangler butts .

    • jr(cathloic against idiots)
      27 June 2013 at 4:42 pm - Reply

      If you want to put it that way. Now, Delia, these people whom you belittleare now protected under the law and youtr treatment and attitude can be considered iscriminatory and ILLEGAL! You are now a law breaker Delia! GET IT!

  • delialusional
    27 June 2013 at 11:58 am - Reply

    Use wrangler in a sentence.

  • Delia
    28 June 2013 at 6:18 am - Reply

    Coming Up Next : lawsuits against churches that refuse to marry same-sex couples…with fines and prison sentences for clergy that oppose this new order.

    • delialusional
      28 June 2013 at 6:40 am - Reply

      There is still a separation between Church and State. This is truly a sad situation for the catholic church, but we now live in a liberal world. Of course, predominantly Catholic countries will never approve of such laws such as same sex marriages (at least for the time-being).

    • Arbi
      28 June 2013 at 4:46 pm - Reply

      @ Delia better yet Dear Bigots, I am sorry for your loss.. Oh wait what did u lose? Lemme try again.. Dear Bigots, I’m sorry your unwanted orphans find loving, stable homes with loving couples.. Wait that isn’t right either… hmm… Dear Bigots, you’re sorry. Good day.